CHAPTER 551 - MISSILE DEFENSE
Title 10 > CHAPTER 551
Sections (18)
§ 5501 National missile defense policy
It is the policy of the United States— to provide for the common defense of the United States and its citizens by deploying and maintaining a next-generation missile defense shield; to deter and defend the United States, citizens of the United States, and critical infrastructure of the United States, against the threat of foreign attack by increasingly complex ballistic, hypersonic glide, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial threats; and to guarantee the viability of an effective nuclear response capability of the United States and to support the continued deterrence of strategic attacks against the homeland of the United States. (Added Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1649(a) , Dec. 23, 2024 , 138 Stat. 2187 ; amended Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title XVI, § 1651 , Dec. 18, 2025 , 139 Stat. 1193 .)
§ 5502 Missile Defense Agency
(a) Appointment of Director.— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall be a general or flag officer appointed for a six-year term.
(b) Deputy Director.— There is a Deputy Director of the Missile Defense Agency, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the general officers on active duty in the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, or from among the flag officers on active duty in the Navy. In selecting an individual to serve as the Deputy Director, the Secretary of Defense shall select an individual who serves in a different armed force than the armed force in which the Director serves. The Deputy Director shall be appointed for a term of not fewer than two, and not more than four years. The Deputy Director shall be under the authority, direction, and control of the Director of the Missile Defense Agency. The Deputy Director shall— carry out such responsibilities as may be assigned by the Director; and serve as acting director during periods of absence by the Director, or at such times as the office of the Director is vacant.
(c) Notification of Changes to Non-standard Acquisition and Requirements Processes and Responsibilities.— The Secretary of Defense may not make any changes to the missile defense non-standard acquisition and requirements processes and responsibilities unless, with respect to those proposed changes— the Secretary, without delegation, has taken each of the actions specified in paragraph (2); and a period of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subparagraph (C) of such paragraph. If the Secretary proposes to make changes to the missile defense non-standard acquisition and requirements processes and responsibilities, the Secretary shall— consult with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Secretaries of the military departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, regarding the changes; certify to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has coordinated the changes with, and received the views of, the individuals referred to in subparagraph (A); submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains— a description of the changes, the rationale for the changes, and the views of the individuals referred to in subparagraph (A) with respect to the changes; a certification that the changes will not impair the missile defense capabilities of the United States nor degrade the unique special acquisition authorities of the Missile Defense Agency; and with respect to any such changes to Department of Defense Directive 5134.09, or successor directive issued in accordance with this subsection, a final draft of the proposed modified directive, both in an electronic format and in a hard copy format; and with respect to any such changes to Department of Defense Directive 5134.09, or successor directive issued in accordance with this subsection, provide to such committees a briefing on the proposed modified directive described in subparagraph (C)(iii). In this subsection, the term “non-standard acquisition and requirements processes and responsibilities” means the processes and responsibilities described in— the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense titled “Missile Defense Program Direction” signed on January 2, 2002 , as in effect on the date of the enactment of this subsection or as modified in accordance with this subsection, or any successor memorandum issued in accordance with this subsection; Department of Defense Directive 5134.09, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this subsection (without regard to any modifications described in Directive-type Memorandum 20–002 of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, or any amendments or extensions thereto made before the date of such enactment), or as modified in accordance with this subsection, or any successor directive issued in accordance with this subsection; and United States Strategic Command Instruction 538–3 titled “MD Warfighter Involvement Process”, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this subsection or as modified in accordance with this subsection, or any successor instruction issued in accordance with this subsection.
§ 5511 Ballistic missile defense programs: program elements
(a) Program Elements Specified by President.— In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for any fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 ), the amount requested for activities of the Missile Defense Agency shall be set forth in accordance with such program elements as the President may specify.
(b) Separate Program Elements for Programs Entering Engineering and Manufacturing Development.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each ballistic missile defense program that enters engineering and manufacturing development is assigned a separate, dedicated program element. In this subsection, the term “engineering and manufacturing development” means the period in the course of an acquisition program during which the primary objectives are to— translate the most promising design approach into a stable, interoperable, producible, supportable, and cost-effective design; validate the manufacturing or production process; and demonstrate system capabilities through testing.
(c) Management and Support.— The amount requested for a fiscal year for any program element specified for that fiscal year pursuant to subsection (a) shall include requests for the amounts necessary for the management and support of the programs, projects, and activities contained in that program element.
§ 5512 Ballistic missile defense programs: display of amounts for research, development, test, and evaluation
(a) Requirement.— Any amount in the budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for any fiscal year for research, development, test, and evaluation for the integration of a ballistic missile defense element into the overall ballistic missile defense architecture shall be set forth under the account of the Department of Defense for Defense-wide research, development, test, and evaluation and, within that account, under the subaccount (or other budget activity level) for the Missile Defense Agency.
(b) Transfer Criteria.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish criteria for the transfer of responsibility for a ballistic missile defense program from the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department. The criteria established for such a transfer shall, at a minimum, address the following: The technical maturity of the program. The availability of facilities for production. The commitment of the Secretary of the military department concerned to procurement funding for that program, as shown by funding through the future-years defense program and other defense planning documents. The Secretary shall submit the criteria established, and any modifications to those criteria, to the congressional defense committees.
(c) Notification of Transfer.— Before responsibility for a ballistic missile defense program is transferred from the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing of the Secretary’s intent to make that transfer. The Secretary shall include with such notice a certification that the program has met the criteria established under subsection (b) for such a transfer. The transfer may then be carried out after the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of such notice.
(d) Conforming Budget and Planning Transfers.— When a ballistic missile defense program is transferred from the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department in accordance with this section, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all appropriate conforming changes are made to proposed or projected funding allocations in the future-years defense program under section 221 of this title and other Department of Defense program, budget, and planning documents.
(e) Follow-on Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, before a ballistic missile defense program is transferred from the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department, roles and responsibilities for research, development, test, and evaluation related to system improvements for that program are clearly delineated.
§ 5513 Unfunded priorities of the Missile Defense Agency: annual report
(a) Reports.— Not later than 10 days after the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31 , the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to the congressional defense committees, a report on the unfunded priorities of the Missile Defense Agency.
(b) Elements.— Each report under subsection (a) shall specify, for each unfunded priority covered by such report, the following: A summary description of such priority, including the objectives to be achieved if such priority is funded (whether in whole or in part). The additional amount of funds recommended in connection with the objectives under subparagraph (A). Account information with respect to such priority, including the following (as applicable): Line Item Number (LIN) for applicable procurement accounts. Program Element (PE) number for applicable research, development, test, and evaluation accounts. Sub-activity group (SAG) for applicable operation and maintenance accounts. Each report under subsection (a) shall present the unfunded priorities covered by such report in order of urgency of priority.
(c) Unfunded Priority Defined.— In this section, the term “unfunded priority”, in the case of a fiscal year, means a program, activity, or mission requirement of the Missile Defense Agency that— is not funded in the budget of the President for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31 , United States Code; is necessary to fulfill a requirement associated with an operational or contingency plan of a combatant command or other validated requirement; and would have been recommended for funding through the budget referred to in paragraph (1) by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency in connection with the budget if additional resources had been available for the budget to fund the program, activity, or mission requirement.
§ 5514 Acquisition accountability on the missile defense system
(a) Baselines Required.— In accordance with paragraph (2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall establish and maintain an acquisition baseline for— each program element of the missile defense system, as specified in section 223 1 of this title; and each designated major subprogram of such program elements. The Director shall establish an acquisition baseline required by paragraph (1) before the date on which the program element or major subprogram enters— engineering and manufacturing development (or its equivalent); and production and deployment. Except as provided by subsection (c), the Director may not adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this section.
(b) Elements of Baselines.— Each acquisition baseline required by subsection (a) for a program element or major subprogram shall include the following: A comprehensive schedule, including— research and development milestones; acquisition milestones, including design reviews and key decision points; key test events, including ground, flight, and cybersecurity tests and ballistic missile defense system tests; delivery and fielding schedules; quantities of assets planned for acquisition and delivery in total and by fiscal year; and planned contract award dates. A detailed technical description of— the capability to be developed, including hardware and software; system requirements, including performance requirements; how the proposed capability satisfies a capability requirement or performance attribute identified through— the missile defense warfighter involvement process, as governed by United States Strategic Command Instruction 538–03, or such successor document; or processes and products reviewed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff or Joint Requirements Oversight Council; key knowledge points that must be achieved to permit continuation of the program and to inform production and deployment decisions; and how the Director plans to improve the capability over time. A cost estimate, including— a life-cycle cost estimate that separately identifies the costs regarding research and development, procurement, military construction, operations and sustainment, and disposal; program acquisition unit costs for the program element; average procurement unit costs and program acquisition costs for the program element; an identification of when the document regarding the program joint cost analysis requirements description is scheduled to be approved; and an explanation for why a program joint cost analysis requirements description has not been prepared and approved, and, if a program joint cost analysis requirements description is not applicable, the rationale for such inapplicability. A test baseline summarizing the comprehensive test program for the program element or major subprogram outlined in the integrated master test plan.
(c) Exception to Limitation on Revision.— The Director may adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this section if the Director submits to the congressional defense committees notification of— a justification for such adjustment or revision; the specific adjustments or revisions made to the acquisition baseline, including to the elements described in subsection (b); and the effective date of the adjusted or revised acquisition baseline.
(d) Operations and Sustainment Cost Estimates.— The Director shall ensure that each life-cycle cost estimate included in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3)(A) includes— all of the operations and sustainment costs for which the Director is responsible; a description of the operations and sustainment functions and costs for which a military department is responsible; the amount of operations and sustainment costs (dollar value and base year) for which the military department or other element of the Department of Defense is responsible; and a citation to the source (such as a joint cost estimate or one or more military department estimates) that captures the operations and sustainment costs for which a military department or other element of the Department of Defense is responsible; the date the source was prepared; and if and when the source was independently verified by the Office for Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
§ 5515 Missile defense and defeat programs: major force program and budget assessment
(a) Establishment of Major Force Program.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish a unified major force program for missile defense and defeat programs pursuant to section 222(b) of this title to prioritize missile defense and defeat programs in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Defense and national security.
(b) Budget Assessment.— The Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2030 a report on the budget for missile defense and defeat programs of the Department of Defense. Each report on the budget for missile defense and defeat programs of the Department under paragraph (1) shall include the following: An overview of the budget, including— a comparison between that budget, the previous budget, the most recent and prior future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title (such comparison shall exclude the responsibility for research and development of the continuing improvement of such missile defense and defeat program), and the amounts appropriated for such missile defense and defeat programs during the previous fiscal year; and the specific identification, as a budgetary line item, for the funding under such programs. An assessment of the budget, including significant changes, priorities, challenges, and risks. Any additional matters the Secretary determines appropriate. Each report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c) Definitions.— In this section: The term “budget”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 . The term “defense budget materials”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal year. The term “missile defense and defeat programs” means active and passive ballistic missile defense programs, cruise missile defense programs for the homeland, and missile defeat programs.
§ 5516 Prohibition on privatized or subscription-based missile defense intercept capabilities
(a) Prohibition.— The Secretary of Defense may only develop, deploy, test, or operate a missile defense system with kinetic missile defense capabilities if— the missile defense system is owned and operated by the armed forces; and such capabilities do not use a subscription-based service, a pay-for-service model, or a recurring-fee model to engage or intercept a target.
(b) Inherently Governmental Function.— The decision to engage in kinetic missile defense activities, including targeting, launch authorization, and engagement of airborne or spaceborne threats, is an inherently governmental function that only officers or employees of the Federal Government or members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force may perform.
(c) Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary of Defense from— entering into contracts with private entities for the research, development, manufacture, maintenance, or testing of missile defense systems; entering into or carrying out co-production or co-development arrangements, or other cooperative agreements, with allies and partners of the United States with respect to missile defense capabilities; or procuring commercial services for remote sensing, telemetry, threat tracking, data analysis, data transport, or early warning, if such services do not directly involve the execution or command of kinetic missile defense activities.
(d) Definitions.— For the purposes of this section: The term “kinetic missile defense activities” means any action intended to physically intercept, neutralize, or destroy a missile, projectile, aircraft, or other airborne threat, including those using kinetic interceptors or directed energy. The term “kinetic missile defense capabilities” means any system or platform that is designed to be able to carry out kinetic missile defense activities. The term “subscription-based service” means any arrangement in which a private entity provides ongoing or recurring operational access to missile defense capabilities in exchange for periodic payment.
§ 5531 Technical authority for integrated air and missile defense activities and programs
(a) In General.— Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency is the technical authority of the Department of Defense for integrated air and missile defense activities and programs, including joint engineering and integration efforts for such activities and programs, including with respect to defining and controlling the system level architectures, interfaces of such activities and programs, and the allocation of technical requirements for such activities and programs.
(b) Detailees.— In carrying out the technical authority under subsection (a), the Director may seek to have staff detailed to the Missile Defense Agency from the Joint Functional Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense and the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization in a number the Director determines necessary in accordance with paragraph (2). In detailing staff under paragraph (1) to carry out the technical authority under subsection (a), the total number of staff, including detailees, of the Missile Defense Agency who carry out such authority may not exceed the number that is twice the number of such staff carrying out such authority as of January 1, 2016 .
§ 5532 Hypersonic defense capability development
(a) Executive Agent.— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall serve as the executive agent for the Department of Defense for the development of a capability by the United States to counter hypersonic boost-glide vehicle capabilities and conventional prompt strike capabilities that may be employed against the United States, the allies of the United States, and the deployed forces of the United States.
(b) Duties.— In carrying out subsection (a), the Director shall— develop architectures for a hypersonic defense capability, from detecting threats to intercepting such threats, that— involves systems of the military departments and the Defense Agencies; and includes both kinetic and nonkinetic options for such interception; and not later than September 30, 2017 , establish a program of record to develop a hypersonic defense capability.
§ 5533 Required testing of ground-based midcourse defense element of ballistic missile defense system
(a) Testing Required.— Except as provided in subsection (c), not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall administer a flight test of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile defense system. Beginning not later than five years after the date on which the next generation interceptor achieves initial operational capability, the Director shall ensure that such flight tests include the next generation interceptor.
(b) Requirements.— The Director shall ensure that each test carried out under subsection (a) provides for one or more of the following: The validation of technical improvements made to increase system performance and reliability. The evaluation of the operational effectiveness of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile defense system. The use of threat-representative targets and critical engagement conditions, including the use of threat-representative countermeasures. The evaluation of new configurations of interceptors before they are fielded. The satisfaction of the “fly before buy” acquisition approach for new interceptor components or software. The evaluation of the interoperability of the ground-based midcourse defense element with other elements of the ballistic missile defense systems.
(c) Exceptions.— The Director may forgo a test under subsection (a) in a fiscal year under one or more of the following conditions: Such a test would jeopardize national security. Insufficient time considerations between post-test analysis and subsequent pre-test design. Insufficient funding. An interceptor is unavailable. A target is unavailable or is insufficiently representative of threats. The test range or necessary test assets are unavailable. Inclement weather. Any other condition the Director considers appropriate.
(d) Certification.— Not later than 45 days after forgoing a test for a condition or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification setting forth the condition or conditions that caused the test to be forgone under such subsection.
(e) Report.— Not later than 45 days after forgoing a test for any condition specified in subsection (c), the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the rationale for forgoing the test and a plan to restore an intercept flight test in the Integrated Master Test Plan of the Missile Defense Agency. In the case of a test forgone for a condition or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the report required by this subsection is in addition to the certification required by subsection (d).
§ 5534 Integration and interoperability of air and missile defense capabilities
(a) Interoperability of Missile Defense Systems.— The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the chairman of the Missile Defense Executive Board (pursuant to section 1681(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 ), acting through the Missile Defense Executive Board, shall ensure the interoperability and integration of the covered air and missile defense capabilities of the United States, including by carrying out operational testing.
(b) Annual Demonstration.— Except as provided by paragraph (2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly ensure that not less than one intercept or flight test is carried out each year that demonstrates interoperability and integration among the covered air and missile defense capabilities of the United States. The Director and the Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (1) with respect to an intercept or flight test carried out during the year covered by the waiver if the chairman of the Missile Defense Executive Board— determines that such waiver is necessary for such year; and submits to the congressional defense committees notification of such waiver, including an explanation for how such waiver will not negatively affect demonstrating the interoperability and integration among the covered air and missile defense capabilities of the United States.
(c) Definition of Covered Air and Missile Defense Capabilities.— In this section, the term “covered air and missile defense capabilities” means Patriot air and missile defense batteries and associated interceptors and systems, Aegis ships and associated ballistic missile interceptors (including Aegis Ashore capability), AN/TPY–2 radars, or terminal high altitude area defense batteries and interceptors.
§ 5535 Development of requirements to support integrated air and missile defense capabilities
(a) In General.— Consistent with the memorandum of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of January 27, 2014 , regarding joint integrated air and missile defense, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall oversee the development of warfighter requirements for persistent and survivable capabilities to detect, identify, determine the status, track, and support engagement of strategically important mobile or relocatable assets in all phases of conflict in order to achieve the objective of preventing the effective employment of such assets, including through offensive actions against such assets prior to their use.
(b) Purpose of Requirements.— The requirements developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used and updated, as appropriate, for the purpose of informing applicable acquisition programs and systems-of-systems architecture planning that are funded through the Military Intelligence Program, the National Intelligence Program, and non-intelligence programs.
(c) Supporting Activities.— The Vice Chairman shall also oversee the development of the enabling framework for intelligence support for integrated air and missile defense, including concepts for the integrated operation of multiple systems, and, as appropriate, the development of requirements for capabilities to be acquired to achieve such integrated operations.
§ 5536 Testing and assessment of missile defense systems prior to production and deployment
(a) Successful Testing Required Prior to Final Production or Operational Deployment.— The Secretary of Defense may not make a final production decision for, or operationally deploy, a covered system unless— the Secretary ensures that— sufficient and operationally realistic testing of the covered system is conducted to assess the performance of the covered system in order to inform a final production decision or an operational deployment decision; and the results of such testing have demonstrated a high probability that the covered system— will work in an operationally effective manner; and has the ability to accomplish the intended mission of the covered system; and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation has carried out subsection (b) with respect to such covered system.
(b) Assessment by Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.— The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall— provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, based on the available test data, of the sufficiency, adequacy, and results of the testing of each covered system, including an assessment of whether the covered system will be sufficiently effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and submit to the congressional defense committees a written summary of such assessment.
(c) Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect a determination of the Secretary with respect to the participation of the Missile Defense Agency in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System or the acquisition reporting process under the Department of Defense Directive 5000 series, or to diminish the authority of the Secretary of Defense to deploy a missile defense system at the date on which the Secretary determines appropriate.
(d) Covered System.— In this section, the term “covered system” means a new or substantially upgraded interceptor or weapon system of the ballistic missile defense system.
§ 5537 Limitation on Missile Defense Agency production of satellites and ground systems associated with operation of such satellites
(a) Production of Satellites and Ground Systems.— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not authorize or obligate funding for a program of record for the production of satellites or ground systems associated with the operation of such satellites.
(b) Prototype Satellites.— The Director, with the concurrence of the Space Acquisition Council established by section 9021 of this title , may authorize the production of one or more prototype satellites, consistent with the requirements of the Missile Defense Agency. Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Space Acquisition Council concurs with the Director with respect to authorizing the production of a prototype satellite under paragraph (1), the chair of the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report explaining the reasons for such concurrence. The Director may not obligate funds for the production of a prototype satellite under paragraph (1) before the date on which the Space Acquisition Council submits the report for such prototype satellite under paragraph (2).
§ 5551 Prohibitions relating to missile defense information and systems
(a) Certain “Hit-to-kill” Technology and Telemetry Data.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation or the People’s Republic of China with “hit-to-kill” technology and telemetry data for missile defense interceptors or target vehicles.
(b) Other Sensitive Missile Defense Information.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation or the People’s Republic of China with— information relating to velocity at burnout of missile defense interceptors or targets of the United States; or classified or otherwise controlled missile defense information.
(c) Exception.— The prohibitions in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to the United States providing to the Russian Federation or the People’s Republic of China information regarding ballistic missile early warning.
(d) Integration.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the Russian Federation or a missile defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile defense system of the United States.
§ 5552 Biannual briefing on missile defense and related activities
(a) In General.— On or about June 1 and December 1 of each year, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on matters relating to missile defense policies, operations, technology development, and other similar topics as requested by such committees.
(b) Officials Specified.— The officials specified in this subsection are the following: The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy. The Director of the Missile Defense Agency. The Director for Strategy, Plans, and Policy of the Joint Staff.
(c) Delegation.— An official specified in subsection (b) may delegate the authority to provide a briefing required by subsection (a) to a member of the Senior Executive Service who reports to the official.
(d) Termination.— The requirement to provide a briefing under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2028 .
§ 5553 Provision of information on flight testing of ground-based midcourse national missile defense system
(a) Information to Be Furnished to Congressional Committees.— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall provide to the congressional defense committees information on the results of each flight test of the ground-based midcourse national missile defense system.
(b) Content.— Information provided under subsection (a) on the results of a flight test shall include the following matters: A thorough discussion of the content and objectives of the test. For each such test objective, a statement regarding whether or not the objective was achieved. For any such test objective not achieved— a thorough discussion describing the reasons that the objective was not achieved; and a discussion of any plans for future tests to achieve that objective.